Will Pending Criminal Charges Show Up in a Background Check?

How Background Check Companies Locate Pending Charges

Commercial background screening companies do not simply query a single centralized master database. Instead, professional Consumer Reporting Agencies (CRAs) utilize a multi-layered investigative methodology that cross-references county, state, and federal judicial records.

When a prosecutor files formal charges—such as a complaint, information, or grand jury indictment—the document is entered into the county court clerk official docket system. Because court proceedings in the United States are constitutionally open to the public, these docket entries become immediately discoverable records.

The visibility of pending criminal charges depends significantly on the screening methodology deployed by consumer reporting agencies. The table below details how various background check tiers capture active court cases.

Most reputable screening companies conduct address history traces based on the applicant Social Security Number to identify all counties where the applicant has resided, worked, or attended school over the past seven to ten years. Professional court researchers then query the computerized docket databases of those specific county courthouses.

If an open, active criminal case is identified, the CRA records the filing date, docket number, specific statutory charges, and current case posture. The agency then reviews federal and state reporting limitations before packaging the information into the final pre-employment report delivered to the hiring manager.

This rigorous public records search explains why pending charges rarely escape detection during comprehensive professional background screenings.

The FCRA Seven-Year Rule and Pending Charge Exceptions

A frequent point of confusion among job seekers is how the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. Section 1681c) treats pending criminal charges versus non-conviction arrest records.

Section 605 of the FCRA explicitly prohibits consumer reporting agencies from reporting non-conviction records—such as arrests that did not lead to charges, dropped cases, or dismissals—that are more than seven years old. Convictions, by contrast, can be reported indefinitely under federal law, although some states impose their own seven-year caps.

Employers must follow federal Fair Credit Reporting Act guidelines when interpreting screening reports containing open charges. The table below highlights key compliance stages and candidate procedural protections.

Crucially, federal regulatory guidance and court precedents treat active pending charges as ongoing legal proceedings rather than historic non-conviction records. Because a pending charge has not yet reached a final disposition, the seven-year statutory clock has not expired, meaning CRAs are permitted under federal law to report active cases regardless of when the initial arrest occurred.

However, once a case reaches a final conclusion—whether through dismissal, acquittal, or completion of a diversion program—the record immediately shifts into the non-conviction category. If that dismissal occurs, the record is immediately subject to state and federal non-conviction reporting shields.

Understanding this timing distinction is vital when coordinating with criminal defense counsel to resolve cases before prospective employers initiate background evaluations.

Employer Consideration and Title VII Disparate Impact Standards

Just because an employer can view a pending criminal charge does not mean they possess unlimited legal authority to automatically reject an applicant.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibiting employment practices that create an unjustified disparate impact on protected racial and ethnic classes. The EEOC has issued unambiguous guidance establishing that an arrest or pending charge alone does not establish that criminal conduct occurred.

Because an arrest record merely reflects a law enforcement officer accusation, an employer cannot establish business necessity based solely on the presence of an open charge. An employer must examine whether the underlying conduct alleged in the charge poses an unacceptable risk to business operations, clients, or fellow employees.

Under the EEOC Green factors, employers must evaluate the gravity of the alleged offense, how long ago the incident occurred, and whether the alleged conduct directly impacts the essential functions of the specific job. For example, a pending charge for reckless driving is highly relevant to a commercial delivery driver position, but largely irrelevant to a warehouse inventory role.

Blanket disqualification policies that automatically reject any applicant with an open court case violate federal civil rights laws and expose employers to substantial class-action liability.

Strategies for Discussing Open Charges with Employers

When an applicant knows a pending charge will appear on an upcoming background check, navigating the conversation with transparency and poise is essential.

If the employer utilizes Ban the Box procedures, applicants should never volunteer criminal history information on initial application forms. However, once a conditional offer is extended and the background check authorization is requested, candidates can proactively manage expectations.

Reaching out to the hiring manager or human resources director before the screening report arrives demonstrates maturity and integrity. Applicants should explain the situation succinctly without oversharing intimate legal details, emphasizing that the matter is ongoing, they are cooperating fully with the legal system, and they maintain their innocence.

Providing documentation from legal counsel confirming court appearance compliance, alongside glowing professional references from past supervisors, helps humanize the applicant and shifts focus back to professional qualifications.

This proactive, professional approach often prevents knee-jerk offer rescissions, encouraging employers to hold offers open pending the final legal outcome.

Related Articles